How is InFactIQ different from Medical Summary Tools?

How is InFactIQ different from Medical Summary Tools?

Medical summary tools turn a stack of records into a chronology. InFactIQ works that same chronology against the testimony, the bills, and the claim data, surfacing where they align and where they don't.

Medical summary tools turn a stack of records into a chronology. InFactIQ works that same chronology against the testimony, the bills, and the claim data, surfacing where they align and where they don't.

Medical summary tools stop at the records

Medical summary tools stop at the records

Built from the testimony

A medical summary tool reads the records and builds the timeline. InFactIQ does that too, then tests it against the deposition and the EUO.

Read for exposure

The same records, read from a litigation perspective: the pre-existing condition, the gap in treatment, the billing that doesn't match the care.

The whole claim, not one file

Summary tools work a file at a time. InFactIQ connects the records, the bills, and the testimony into a single body of evidence.

InFactIQ vs Medical Summary Tools

InFactIQ vs Medical Summary Tools

Leaders choose us because we’ve systematized
AI transformation, not improvised it.

Leaders choose us because we’ve systematized AI transformation, not improvised it.

Features

InFactIQ

InFactIQ

InFactIQ

Medical Summary Tools

Medical Summary Tools

Medical Summary Tools

Cross-analysis across transcripts, records and bills

Cross-analysis across transcripts, records and bills

Yes

Yes

Records and bills only

Records and bills only

Deposition prep and question generation

Deposition prep and question generation

Yes

Yes

No

No

EUO support

EUO support

Yes

Yes

No

No

Cross-document contradiction detection

Cross-document contradiction detection

Yes, testimony against records

Yes, testimony against records

Within the records only

Within the records only

Behavioral analysis

Behavioral analysis

Yes

Yes

No

No

Medical chronology

Medical chronology

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Gap and pre-existing condition detection

Gap and pre-existing condition detection

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Claims-specific workflows

Claims-specific workflows

Yes

Yes

Record review, not claim strategy

Record review, not claim strategy

Insurance litigation focus

Insurance litigation focus

Yes

Yes

Medical review for claims

Medical review for claims

[01]

Where the testimony breaks from the record

InFactIQ flags where a deposition or EUO contradicts the medical timeline and shows the testimony and the record side by side, the cross-check a chronology tool leaves to you.

[02]

Records, bills, and testimony in one place

InFactIQ analyzes all of a claim’s evidence together, not the medical file alone, so the chronology connects to what was said and what was billed.

[03]

Read for the entire case theory

InFactIQ reads all the records for a complete understanding of the claim: the pre-existing condition, the gap, the contradiction with the testimony, and what each does to exposure.

Litigation teams do more with InFactIQ

80k

cases

100k

transcripts/year

18k-page

medical record analyzed in 30 min (with source citations)

80k

cases

100k

transcripts/year

18k-page

medical record analyzed in 30 min (with source citations)

80k

cases

100k

transcripts/year

18k-page

medical record analyzed in 30 min (with source citations)

80k

cases

100k

transcripts/year

18k-page

medical record analyzed in 30 min (with source citations)

Built to work your claim

Bring a deposition with the summary already done and see what InFactIQ surfaces when it reads the testimony against the records and the bills.

Built to work your claim

Bring a deposition with the summary already done and see what InFactIQ surfaces when it reads the testimony against the records and the bills.

Built to work your claim

Bring a deposition with the summary already done and see what InFactIQ surfaces when it reads the testimony against the records and the bills.